Content preview: 2015-04-15 0:56 GMT+02:00 Evelyn Scidmore : > On 4/14/2015
2:53 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: >> >> Clément OUDOT wrote: >>> >>> 2015-04-14
10:18 GMT+02:00 Hallvard Breien Furuseth >>> : >>>> >>>> It will drop in
Google's ratings next week because it fails the >>>> <https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/>
tests. >>>> Maybe someone can fix the web pages up a bit? I'm too busy now.
Post by Clément OUDOTPost by Hallvard Breien FurusethAlready fixed in the mean-time? > > Since I have easy access to
make the changes, I went ahead and fixed this so > that for most purposes
in non-mobile browsers things look the same, but on > mobile browsers everything
is more friendly. The whole site could probably > use a revamp at some point,
but solving the problem in front of us here (the > concern about google page
* As Michael Ströder said, adding <meta name="viewport" > content="width�vice-width,
initial-scale=1"> > * Changing the table with the bullet points on the main
page so that it's > using floating divs instead of tables with columns, letting
it wrap properly > for very narrow (mobile) displays. > > The end result
is that it should look the same for most users. For anyone > who is using
a small display, it should function without pushing everything > off the side
of the screen. Google's analysis tool now calls it mobile > friendly. [...]
Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[209.85.220.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(clem.oudot[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Cc: openldap-***@openldap.org
X-BeenThere: openldap-***@openldap.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenLDAP development discussion list <openldap-devel.openldap.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.openldap.org/lists/mm/options/openldap-devel>,
<mailto:openldap-devel-***@openldap.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:openldap-***@openldap.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openldap-devel-***@openldap.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.openldap.org/lists/mm/listinfo/openldap-devel>,
<mailto:openldap-devel-***@openldap.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: openldap-devel-***@openldap.org
Sender: "openldap-devel" <openldap-devel-***@openldap.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "gauss.openldap.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: 2015-04-15 0:56 GMT+02:00 Evelyn Scidmore : > On 4/14/2015
2:53 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: >> >> Clément OUDOT wrote: >>> >>> 2015-04-14
10:18 GMT+02:00 Hallvard Breien Furuseth >>> : >>>> >>>> It will drop in
Google's ratings next week because it fails the >>>> <https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/>
tests. >>>> Maybe someone can fix the web pages up a bit? I'm too busy now.
Post by Clément OUDOTPost by Hallvard Breien FurusethAlready fixed in the mean-time? > > Since I have easy access to
make the changes, I went ahead and fixed this so > that for most purposes
in non-mobile browsers things look the same, but on > mobile browsers everything
is more friendly. The whole site could probably > use a revamp at some point,
but solving the problem in front of us here (the > concern about google page
* As Michael Ströder said, adding <meta name="viewport" > content="width�vice-width,
initial-scale=1"> > * Changing the table with the bullet points on the main
page so that it's > using floating divs instead of tables with columns, letting
it wrap properly > for very narrow (mobile) displays. > > The end result
is that it should look the same for most users. For anyone > who is using
a small display, it should function without pushing everything > off the side
of the screen. Google's analysis tool now calls it mobile > friendly. [...]
Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[209.85.220.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(clem.oudot[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Post by Clément OUDOT2015-04-14 10:18 GMT+02:00 Hallvard Breien Furuseth
Post by Hallvard Breien FurusethIt will drop in Google's ratings next week because it fails the
<https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/> tests.
Maybe someone can fix the web pages up a bit? I'm too busy now.
Already fixed in the mean-time?
Since I have easy access to make the changes, I went ahead and fixed this so
that for most purposes in non-mobile browsers things look the same, but on
mobile browsers everything is more friendly. The whole site could probably
use a revamp at some point, but solving the problem in front of us here (the
concern about google page rankings) without having to rework the site
* As Michael Ströder said, adding <meta name="viewport"
content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
* Changing the table with the bullet points on the main page so that it's
using floating divs instead of tables with columns, letting it wrap properly
for very narrow (mobile) displays.
The end result is that it should look the same for most users. For anyone
who is using a small display, it should function without pushing everything
off the side of the screen. Google's analysis tool now calls it mobile
friendly.
Well, thanks for fixing the mobile view.
But I think we could have a more general discussion about the look and
feel of the website. I agree OpenLDAP is dedicated to system
administrators, but this is not an excuse to have an, excuse me for
the term, "ugly" website.
There is also a work to do on the content, as some pages were not
updated since years, see for example: http://www.openldap.org/conf/
I am willing to help the community on this topic, if any help is welcome.
Clément.